根据现有的氧化所有证据
2021年5月6日,欧盟据欧盟食品安全局(EFSA)消息,重新欧盟食品添加剂和调味剂小组( FAF )重新评估了 二氧化钛(titanium dioxide )(E171)作为食品添加剂的评估品添安全性。
根据现有的氧化所有证据,不能排除该添加剂对遗传毒性的钛作担忧,鉴于存在许多不确定性,为食评估小组得出结论,加剂当E171用作食品添加剂时,全性不再被认为是欧盟安全的。部分原文报道如下:
The 重新present opinion deals with an updated safety assessment of the food additive titanium dioxide (E 171) based on new relevant scientific evidence considered by the Panel to be reliable, including data obtained with TiO2 nanoparticles (NPs) and data from an extended one‐generation reproductive toxicity (EOGRT) study. Less than 50% of constituent particles by number in E 171 have a minimum external dimension < 100 nm. In addition, the Panel noted that constituent particles < 30 nm amounted to less than 1% of particles by number. The Panel therefore considered that studies with TiO2 NPs < 30 nm were of limited relevance to the safety assessment of E 171. The Panel concluded that although gastrointestinal absorption of TiO2 particles is low, they may accumulate in the body. Studies on general and organ toxicity did not indicate adverse effects with either E 171 up to a dose of 1,000 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day or with TiO2 NPs (> 30 nm) up to the highest dose tested of 100 mg/kg bw per day. No effects on reproductive and developmental toxicity were observed up to a dose of 1,000 mg E 171/kg bw per day, the highest dose tested in the EOGRT study. However, observations of potential immunotoxicity and inflammation with E 171 and potential neurotoxicity with TiO2 NPs, together with the potential induction of aberrant crypt foci with E 171, may indicate adverse effects. With respect to genotoxicity, the Panel concluded that TiO2 particles have the potential to induce DNA strand breaks and chromosomal damage, but not gene mutations. No clear correlation was observed between the physico‐chemical properties of TiO2 particles and the outcome of either in vitro or in vivo genotoxicity assays. A concern for genotoxicity of TiO2 particles that may be present in E 171 could therefore not be ruled out. Several modes of action for the genotoxicity may operate in parallel and the relative contributions of different molecular mechanisms elicited by TiO2 particles are not known. There was uncertainty as to whether a threshold mode of action could be assumed. In addition, a cut‐off value for TiO2 particle size with respect to genotoxicity could not be identified. No appropriately designed study was available to investigate the potential carcinogenic effects of TiO2 NPs. based on all the evidence available, a concern for genotoxicity could not be ruled out, and given the many uncertainties, the Panel concluded that E 171 can no longer be considered as safe when used as a food additive.
声明:本文所用图片、文字来源《食品伙伴网》,评估品添版权归原作者所有。氧化如涉及作品内容、钛作版权等问题,为食请与本网联系删除。加剂
相关链接:食品添加剂,调味剂,二氧化钛
相关阅读
- 家庭漫笔500篇战顺治愈的小漫笔,催泪的文章
- 酸解法检测对食品添加剂糖醇类产品总糖含量的影响(一)
- 水中氨氮溶液标准物质:水质污染监测与评估的标准基准
- 新型高科技建筑节能玻璃莱西投产,企业新闻
- 三年收卖目标2000亿!京东与小米周齐深化计谋开做 -
- 千家寨野生古茶树叶片解剖结构和化学组分计量特征对海拔梯度的适应(四)
- 浙江启动新一轮“小微企业三年成长计划”
- 福耀集团2011年第二次临时股东大会决议公告,企业新闻
- 顺歉个人与湖北机场个人召开2024年鄂州花湖机场货运逝世少专题研讨会
- “盯”“防”并举 北京通州强化进口冷链食品监管
- 我为群众办实事|广东佛山查扣假冒伪劣电线电缆497卷
- 新型玻璃在国家战略性新兴产业中的应用及发展,市场研究
- 感情讲讲表情文章治愈读文短篇伉俪感情书语
- DITA限量酒瓶受到亚洲女性疯狂收藏,行业资讯
- “盯”“防”并举 北京通州强化进口冷链食品监管
- 广州推出安乐“查”饭监管品牌行动
- 分红险与年金险的差别在哪
- 南玻A光伏业务一体起飞 传统玻璃转型完成,企业新闻
- 新型高科技建筑节能玻璃莱西投产,企业新闻
- 我为群众办实事|一条热线 情系民生 河北省邢台市12315投诉举报中心工作纪实